JavaScript Code Generator¶
The command daml codegen js
generates JavaScript (and TypeScript) that can be used in conjunction with the JavaScript Client Libraries for interacting with a Daml ledger via the HTTP JSON API.
Inputs to the command are DAR files. Outputs are JavaScript packages with TypeScript typings containing metadata and types for all Daml packages included in the DAR files.
The generated packages use the library @daml/types.
Usage¶
In outline, the command to generate JavaScript and TypeScript typings from Daml is daml codegen js -o OUTDIR DAR
where DAR
is the path to a DAR file (generated via daml build
) and OUTDIR
is a directory where you want the artifacts to be written.
Here’s a complete example on a project built from the standard “skeleton” template.
1 2 3 4 | daml new my-proj --template skeleton # Create a new project based off the skeleton template
cd my-proj # Enter the newly created project directory
daml build # Compile the project's Daml files into a DAR
daml codegen js -o daml.js .daml/dist/my-proj-0.0.1.dar # Generate JavaScript packages in the daml.js directory
|
- On execution of these commands:
- The directory
my-proj/daml.js
contains generated JavaScript packages with TypeScript typings; - The files are arranged into directories;
- One of those directories will be named my-proj-0.0.1 and will contain the definitions corresponding to the Daml files in the project;
- For example,
daml.js/my-proj-0.0.1/lib/index.js
provides access to the definitions fordaml/Main.daml
; - The remaining directories correspond to modules of the Daml standard library;
- Those directories have numeric names (the names are hashes of the Daml-LF package they are derived from).
- The directory
To get a quickstart idea of how to use what has been generated, you may wish to jump to the Templates and choices section and return to the reference material that follows as needed.
Primitive Daml types: @daml/types¶
To understand the TypeScript typings produced by the code generator, it is helpful to keep in mind this quick review of the TypeScript equivalents of the primitive Daml types provided by @daml/types.
Interfaces:
Template<T extends object, K = unknown>
Choice<T extends object, C, R, K = unknown>
Types:
Daml | TypeScript | TypeScript definition |
---|---|---|
() |
Unit |
{} |
Bool |
Bool |
boolean |
Int |
Int |
string |
Decimal |
Decimal |
string |
Numeric ν |
Numeric |
string |
Text |
Text |
string |
Time |
Time |
string |
Party |
Party |
string |
[τ] |
List<τ> |
τ[] |
Date |
Date |
string |
ContractId τ |
ContractId<τ> |
string |
Optional τ |
Optional<τ> |
null | (null extends τ ?
[] | [Exclude<τ, null>] : τ) |
TextMap τ |
TextMap<τ> |
{ [key: string]: τ } |
(τ₁, τ₂) |
Tuple₂<τ₁, τ₂> |
{_1: τ₁; _2: τ₂} |
Note
The types given in the “TypeScript” column are defined in @daml/types.
Note
For n-tuples where n ≥ 3, representation is analogous with the pair case (the last line of the table).
Note
The TypeScript types Time
, Decimal
, Numeric
and Int
all alias to string
. These choices relate to the avoidance of precision loss under serialization over the json-api.
Note
The TypeScript definition of type Optional<τ>
in the above table might look complicated. It accounts for differences in the encoding of optional values when nested versus when they are not (i.e. “top-level”). For example, null
and "foo"
are two possible values of Optional<Text>
whereas, []
and ["foo"]
are two possible values of type Optional<Optional<Text>>
(null
is another possible value, [null]
is not).
Daml to TypeScript mappings¶
The mappings from Daml to TypeScript are best explained by example.
Records¶
In Daml, we might model a person like this.
1 2 3 4 5 | data Person =
Person with
name: Text
party: Party
age: Int
|
Given the above definition, the generated TypeScript code will be as follows.
1 2 3 4 5 | type Person = {
name: string;
party: daml.Party;
age: daml.Int;
}
|
Variants¶
This is a Daml type for a language of additive expressions.
1 2 3 4 | data Expr a =
Lit a
| Var Text
| Add (Expr a, Expr a)
|
In TypeScript, it is represented as a discriminated union.
1 2 3 4 | type Expr<a> =
| { tag: 'Lit'; value: a }
| { tag: 'Var'; value: string }
| { tag: 'Add'; value: {_1: Expr<a>, _2: Expr<a>} }
|
Sum-of-products¶
Let’s slightly modify the Expr a
type of the last section into the following.
1 2 3 4 | data Expr a =
Lit a
| Var Text
| Add {lhs: Expr a, rhs: Expr a}
|
Compared to the earlier definition, the Add
case is now in terms of a record with fields lhs
and rhs
. This renders in TypeScript like so.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | type Expr<a> =
| { tag: 'Lit2'; value: a }
| { tag: 'Var2'; value: string }
| { tag: 'Add'; value: Expr.Add<a> }
namespace Expr {
type Add<a> = {
lhs: Expr<a>;
rhs: Expr<a>;
}
}
|
The thing to note is how the definition of the Add
case has given rise to a record type definition Expr.Add
.
Enums¶
Given a Daml enumeration like this,
1 | data Color = Red | Blue | Yellow
|
the generated TypeScript will consist of a type declaration and the definition of an associated companion object.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | type Color = 'Red' | 'Blue' | 'Yellow'
const Color = {
Red: 'Red',
Blue: 'Blue',
Yellow: 'Yellow',
keys: ['Red','Blue','Yellow'],
} as const;
|
Templates and choices¶
Here is a Daml template of a basic ‘IOU’ contract.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | template Iou
with
issuer: Party
owner: Party
currency: Text
amount: Decimal
where
signatory issuer
choice Transfer: ContractId Iou
with
newOwner: Party
controller owner
do
create this with owner = newOwner
|
The daml codegen js
command generates types for each of the choices defined on the template as well as the template itself.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | type Transfer = {
newOwner: daml.Party;
}
type Iou = {
issuer: daml.Party;
owner: daml.Party;
currency: string;
amount: daml.Numeric;
}
|
Each template results in the generation of a companion object. Here, is a schematic of the one generated from the Iou
template [2].
1 2 3 4 5 6 | const Iou: daml.Template<Iou, undefined> & {
Archive: daml.Choice<Iou, DA_Internal_Template.Archive, {}, undefined>;
Transfer: daml.Choice<Iou, Transfer, daml.ContractId<Iou>, undefined>;
} = {
/* ... */
}
|
[2] | The undefined type parameter captures the fact that Iou has no contract key. |
The exact details of these companion objects are not important - think of them as representing “metadata”.
What is important is the use of the companion objects when creating contracts and exercising choices using the @daml/ledger package. The following code snippet demonstrates their usage.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 | import Ledger from '@daml/ledger';
import {Iou, Transfer} from /* ... */;
const ledger = new Ledger(/* ... */);
// Contract creation; Bank issues Alice a USD $1MM IOU.
const iouDetails: Iou = {
issuer: 'Chase',
owner: 'Alice',
currency: 'USD',
amount: 1000000.0,
};
const aliceIouCreateEvent = await ledger.create(Iou, iouDetails);
const aliceIouContractId = aliceIouCreateEvent.contractId;
// Choice execution; Alice transfers ownership of the IOU to Bob.
const transferDetails: Transfer = {
newOwner: 'Bob',
}
const [bobIouContractId, _] = await ledger.exercise(Transfer, aliceIouContractId, transferDetails);
|
Observe on line 14, the first argument to create
is the Iou
companion object and on line 22, the first argument to exercise
is the Transfer
companion object.